Writing Task - 2

Students in school should learn academic subject and pass exams other skills such as cookery, dressmaking and wood work can be learnt well from family and friends.

Do you agree or disagree?

Hook statement: - Education plays an imperative role in attaining zenith of success to have a sophisticated life in later years.

Importance of academic subjects: -

·       The basic knowledge of academic subjects such as math, life science, social science and language makes children well informed citizen of tomorrow.

·       Enables children to become competent to face future circumstances.

·       Bring better career prospects.

·       Make children more confident

·       Exploring things become easy for students.

Importance of Non academic subjects: -

·       Nonacademic subject like craft and other vocational subjects improves intelligence level of students. Example recent researches claim that there is a direct correlation between hand and eye coordination and the development of the brain.

·       Helpful in learning academic subjects through real life application such as math.

·       Craft education takes away gender stereotypes (no gender inequality) both girls and boys can learn and adopt the skills.

·       If such subjects are taught in school then students /school goers can adopt them as career options after school and start earning early on in life.

Conclusion: - Both academic and non-academic subjects are equally important to be learnt by school goers for overall development/growth. On the other hand, negligence of one can hinder the growth of the children.

Writing Task - 2

As the world is becoming more global more and more languages are dying out. Some people believe that life would be easy if there will be less number of languages in the world.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

It is undeniable that language is the means with help of which we can express our thought and feeling and there are numerous languages which are spoken throughout the world and as the world is becoming more globalized, more and more people are speaking similar languages due to which many of the languages are becoming extinct. It is asserted that life will be easy with less number of languages which is the topic of further discussion.

To dive into the topic, I partly standup with the statement as due to less number of dialects it will be very easy for people to communicate to each other which will definitely improve harmony not only between people but also nations. Moreover, with less number of languages in the world, tradesmen will have more opportunities to expand their business operations globally.

Secondly, apart from these benefits migrations and immigrations to other countries will become more convenient as it would be easy for people to move to foreign locations for work, study and so on. In addition to this, if language barrier is removed it would be easy for nation to understand and help each other by sharing and exchanging their technology and resources and they will be able to assist each other more appropriately.

Thirdly, flipping to the other side, due to less number of languages it will be easy for people to lose their identity as this will lead to people forgetting their History and culture in the long run. Also, a piece of history may also be lost as many historical texts and manuscripts may not be understandable.

Taking everything into an account my foregone conclusion is that without a doubt like would be easy with less number of dialects in the world as it will promote peace and harmony but it should be kept in mind that this trend also leads to individual losing their sense of identity and culture.

Writing task 2

Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and uses up the world’s fuel resources.

To what extent do you agree or disagree?

 Introduction: - It is irrefutable that flying jets have become most eminent mode of transportation among visitors. The most high-tech mode of transportation has become a topic of debate nowadays. As it is asserted by some masses that air travel is causing major harm to the environment in matter of burning a tremendous amount of fossil fuel each year and depleting the world oil reserve, and demand that it should be limited.

Disagree: - 1. Many government’s economics depend solely on the income provided by tourism sector which is vitally depend on air travel + example.

2. Many environmentalists have proven that air travel is rather friendly to the environment in comparison to other means of transportation. Additionally, ground and maritime means of transportation producing more than triple CO2 emission and consume way more fossil fuel than air travel.

3. It is one of the easiest ways to commute from one place to another.

4. Less time consuming.

5. This facility has surged the number of business and made easy and short travelling frequency + example.

6. Provide range of job opportunities. To illustrate a survey conducted by Delhi University in 2015 stated that there are 500 million jobs in this department which attracted youngsters due to basic pay and allowances.

Agree: - 1. Less plane usage reduces the amount of fuel usage.

2. It will diminish the environmental issue to the major extent as less number of air plane would fly in the air, it will exhaust less amount of toxic gases in the atmosphere.

3. This action may lead to avail the more land for the people’s shelter who are homeless + example.

Conclusion: - Minimized flight schedule globally is not a viable or long-term solution to tackle the issue of fossil fuel depletion pollution. So, scientists must find a fossil fuel replacement in the future.